|
Title: Brutal block Post by: Geryon on December 28, 2007, 09:37:33 pm Please add maces and flails and remove whips from brutal blocking. Will add some variety to outcasts weapon choice.
Title: Re: Brutal block Post by: Caleb on December 28, 2007, 10:54:51 pm i was under impression brutal block worked for axe and sword only.
If you added more however , you might as well add for cross block ass well (knighs equivlent) Title: Re: Brutal block Post by: Kage on December 28, 2007, 11:01:21 pm - sword , axe or whip actually, seems plenty...crossblock is only mace and sword. 3to2
Title: Re: Brutal block Post by: Caleb on December 28, 2007, 11:05:49 pm i always favoured brutal block because it works with only one weapon, and by that instance, wearing
two weapons gave double chances?. cross block you need to be dual wielding. sort of like flourentine with some flexibility. Title: Re: Brutal block Post by: Kage on December 28, 2007, 11:07:57 pm -yup its better I think...but im "sure" its all balanced somewhere else *wink*
Title: Re: Brutal block Post by: Geryon on December 29, 2007, 12:21:07 am knights anyway have no use in any dual weapons other than swords (riposte+righteous warfare), so giving them crossblock with other weapons won't affect much
Title: Re: Brutal block Post by: Matthew on December 29, 2007, 12:26:22 am I hate that your forced to dual wield all the time
Title: Re: Brutal block Post by: Kage on December 29, 2007, 01:01:56 am - true, knights and paladins in fantasy worlds commonly wear a shield. too bad no one likes shields or that shields are no fun.
Title: Re: Brutal block Post by: Geryon on January 03, 2008, 01:15:13 pm No one likes shields because of crappy shield block and shield being cleft easily. During the times of shield specialization knights ran about with shields only.
Title: Re: Brutal block Post by: Matthew on January 03, 2008, 01:45:43 pm Which is how it should be, i knight with no shield is naked... or using a big twohanded sword or something, which there is also no real skillset for...
|