Bad times...

[Proph]

Heh.... seems they changed a little bit on the look of the helpfiles but the content remains the same as before. I was wondering about that lawful bit

I've talked to one immortal recently though, and he/she said that the book in the solamnic keep is very close to correct, so I think most of the ideas about being an example of righteousness are still valid. I'm not saying that Solamnia should never attack in town (nor should takhisis be prevented), because of course you can't offer the cities as a haven for evil-doers. What I am saying is that if "[your] honor is [your] life" then maybe you could try to reason things out and express your opinions before attacking people unawares all over the city.

[Quino]

You forget that nomaly gates of cities of goodies will be closed to any evils and outlaws. But in Solace they are not.

You are wrong. Who told you Palanthas (for example) is a city for gooddies? Evils can born there also as I recall. Besides, even inArkham (you said it is EVIL city) - guards are good-aligned and they attack evils if they break law there. Not to mention that evil cities then should be closed to gooddies.

Drunr can be excused as he hates cities; but you act just like another criminal.
There is such definition - lawful evil - exiled baby dark elf walks down the streets and respects the law. Suddenly good elf just rips his head off. Would you call this elf a saviour of innocent? If that evil did not touched anyone in city - because he respects law?

Still, as elves respect life in all means cannot then understand your bloodthirst. See only powerseek.

[Sirrion]

About girl - this is question of good/evil, not lawful/chaotic. If a girl touches noone, she is simply not evil.

And about elves... read Dragonlance, DL elves are different from LOTR elves.

[Chislev]

And, you seem to point to my presence in the realms as proof we absolutely accept such actions.

If I am not watching that specific happenstance, it must be brought to my attention. And it was not, as I recall.