|
Title: Trolls Post by: Sgt Pepper on November 30, 2004, 03:10:39 am In terms of nature protecting, trolls can be considerated poor animals in need of protection ??? ???
I mean, they "killed" the dead forest, but the anti-ranger has a troll-slayer, so I'm a bit confused. Title: Re: Trolls Post by: Solan on November 30, 2004, 03:14:07 am Anti-ranger doesn't want those trolls taking all of his tree-frags!
And I've been wondering about this for a while, don't think the destroyers of forests should be protected by the guardians of the forest ;) Title: Re: Trolls Post by: Jemma on November 30, 2004, 03:23:36 am He stoll the troll-slayer from a ranger trying to protect the forest. The anti-ranger wants the trolls to work for him, and destroy the forest ... hence, he is anti ... against ;D :P
Title: Re: Trolls Post by: Solan on November 30, 2004, 04:39:50 am Actually this is a bit important...should Warders protect any mob who spawns inside a forest, or use judgement to protect the rightful inhabitants of the forest, and the forest itself? Personally I think the latter, but generally Warders I speak with think the former...
Title: Re: Trolls Post by: Jemma on November 30, 2004, 04:50:41 am hmm, the word was stole not stoll. And I don't think trolls are natural inhabitants to the forest, therefore should NOT be a protected species.
Title: Re: Trolls Post by: Geryon on December 01, 2004, 05:52:46 pm People, you are talking rubbish. Look at the anti-rangers descs and read that they wield troll- and naga-slayers just to keep their pet trolls and nagas under control.
|